Depp penthouse worker ‘saw blemishes on Heard after Elon Musk short-term remain’ The front work area director at Johnny Depp’s Los Angeles penthouse building has told the High Court in London that she saw blemishes on Amber Heard’s body after Tesla author Elon Musk had obviously gone through the night there. Trinity Esparza said she
Depp penthouse worker ‘saw blemishes on Heard after Elon Musk short-term remain’
The front work area director at Johnny Depp’s Los Angeles penthouse building has told the High Court in London that she saw blemishes on Amber Heard’s body after Tesla author Elon Musk had obviously gone through the night there. Trinity Esparza said she saw “no noticeable wounds at all to Ms Heard’s face” three days after Mr Depp, presently 57, purportedly hit his ex, 34, in the face with her own cell phone on May 21 2016. She said the first occasion when she saw any imprints on Ms Heard’s face that week was on May 27, the day the Aquaman on-screen character showed up in court to get a limiting request against Mr Depp, which “upset” Ms Esparza.She likewise said that the next week, another occupant in the structure found a gift voucher – which she said dropped out of a huge plant sent to the structure for Ms Heard – which read: “I had a magnificent end of the week with you. E.” Ms Esparza said in her observer explanation that she saw “various imprints on Ms Heard’s body” – remembering wounds for her neck, mortars on her arm and an imprint beneath her left eye – on a day in June or July 2016, not long after Mr Musk had left the structure looking “like he had recently woken up with chaotic hair”. The observer was giving proof by videolink from California on Monday in Mr Depp’s preliminary against The Sun paper over an April 2018 article which marked him an “undershirt”.Ms Esparza, who claims the organization that gave attendant services at the Eastern Columbia building where Mr Depp possessed five condos, said she had functioned as the front work area director for around six years and “much of the time saw and connected with Ms Heard face to face” for over a year. In her announcement, she said she “saw and associated with Ms Heard on May 23, May 24 and May 25 with a reasonable and plain face”. Sasha Wass QC, speaking to The Sun’s distributer News Group Newspapers, said to Ms Esparza: “Isn’t it progressively precise to state you saw her before in the week and you didn’t see it?”Ms Esparza answered: “That isn’t exact, I saw her unmistakably.” She said she was not on the job on May 21, when Mr Depp is affirmed to have shown up at the penthouse “smashed and high” at that point became “chafed” and tossed Ms Heard’s cell phone at her “like somebody tossing a baseball”. Ms Esparza said she saw Ms Heard on May 23 when she was strolling through the entryway. She said in her announcement: “I glanced her privilege in the face as we made proper acquaintance and I saw no noticeable wounds at all to Ms Heard’s face.”Ms Esparza said she had “another experience with Ms Heard in closeness” on May 24 and “by and by, I didn’t perceive any noticeable wounds to her face”. She included she saw Ms Heard again the following day and “didn’t perceive any wounds, cuts, growing, red imprints or some other wounds of any sort to Ms Heard’s face or body”. Ms Esparza said she next observed Ms Heard on May 27, strolling towards her “with a dismal look all over”. The observer stated: “Presently, just because that week, she had a red imprint underneath her eye.
“Either soon thereafter or the next morning, I saw media reports that Ms Heard had acquired a limiting request against Mr Depp for local maltreatment originating from the May 21 affirmed episode. “Subsequent to seeing the news reports, Ms Heard’s battered face and local maltreatment charges, I was upset.” She said she knew “Mr Depp left on May 21 and had not yet returned”. Ms Esparza said she chose to audit CCTV film from the past scarcely any days and “that is the point at which I understood with conviction that the story in the media didn’t make any sense”.She said she “went over a video that made me much progressively suspicious of Ms Heard’s claims” – film from May 24 of Ms Heard’s sister Whitney Henriquez evidently tossing “a phony punch into the noticeably plain face of Ms Heard”, before the pair and their companions “all tossed their heads back in giggling”. Ms Wass stated: “I recommend that there was no phony punch in the manner that you have portrayed.” Ms Esparza answered: “There was a phony punch.” Depicting the occurrence when Mr Musk is proposed to have remained at the condo, Ms Esparza stated: “On that late June or early July morning, Elon Musk descended from the main lift that goes to the penthouses and requested that I coxcomb him to the carport. “It was around 9am toward the beginning of the day and he seemed as though he had recently woken up with chaotic hair.”She included that she didn’t perceive Mr Musk, yet was told who he was by an occupant who portrayed him as his “saint”. Ms Esparaza guaranteed Alejandro Romero, one of the attendants at the structure, revealed to her he had watched Mr Musk visiting Ms Heard “ordinarily … for over a year by then”. She included that Ms Heard descended soon thereafter, saying she had lost her keys. Ms Esparza stated: “When we were remaining close to one another, I could see various imprints on Ms Heard’s body. “She had three little round wounds on the left hand side of her neck and two Band-Aids on her arm. Ms Heard likewise had a swoon blemish to her left side cheek, beneath her eye.”